Planned UnifyOS module · Operating & maintenance intelligence

Operate the asset from the record the project actually produced.

Most operating teams inherit an asset they cannot see clearly: incomplete asset registers, warranties nobody can find, maintenance regimes built from guesswork, and no link back to how the building was designed or delivered.

The planned facilities-management module takes the verified handover record forward into operations, so maintenance, compliance and lifecycle decisions rest on structured asset data rather than reconstruction.

In design — shaped with operators and landlord facilities teams

These modules are roadmap positions within UnifyOS. They are in design or scoping, are not available today, and no delivery dates are committed. They are published so clients can see the direction of the platform and shape it — not to imply released functionality.

The problem

What goes wrong today.

  • Asset registers that never matched what was installed
  • Warranty and statutory obligations discovered only when something fails
  • Planned maintenance regimes disconnected from the actual specification
  • Recurring defects never traced back to a design or delivery cause
  • No portfolio comparison of operating performance between assets

The intent

What the module is designed to do.

  • Carry the verified asset and system record into operations
  • Track statutory inspection, testing and certification obligations
  • Structure planned and reactive maintenance against installed assets
  • Hold warranty positions and expiry against the responsible party
  • Surface recurring failures and their delivery-stage causes
  • Report operating compliance and condition across a portfolio

Data it would work from

Records that already exist on your projects.

  • Verified handover and asset records
  • Statutory inspection and testing regimes
  • CAFM and maintenance-management systems
  • Warranty and contract documentation
  • Condition surveys and fault history

Capabilities

What the module would do, in detail.

Worked through with delivery teams running live completions, so the design starts from how handover actually behaves.

Operating baseline carried from handover

The verified asset and system register produced at completion becomes the operating record directly — no post-occupation survey, no re-keying, and every asset still linked to the certificate, warranty and drawing it came with.

Statutory obligation calendar

Inspection, testing and certification duties are held against each installed system with their frequency and responsible party, so lapses are visible before the certificate expires rather than at audit.

Planned maintenance built from specification

Maintenance regimes are derived from the specified and installed equipment rather than a generic template, so the tasks, intervals and spares match what is actually in the building.

Warranty position tracking

Warranty scope, duration, expiry and the responsible contractor or supplier are held per asset, so a failure is dealt with as a warranty claim while the entitlement still stands.

Defect cause tracing

Recurring faults are traced back through the handover and review record to their design, specification or installation cause, so the same defect stops being solved repeatedly at operating cost.

Operating compliance and condition reporting

Compliance position, outstanding statutory items, condition and maintenance performance report consistently across assets, giving owners a comparable operating view.

What it produces

The records it would hand you.

Live asset and system register

What is installed, where, to what specification, with its evidence attached.

Statutory compliance position

Inspections and certificates due, completed and overdue per asset and system.

Maintenance regime pack

Planned tasks, intervals and spares structured against the installed equipment.

Warranty register

Coverage, expiry dates and the responsible party for every warranted asset.

Recurring defect report

Repeat failures with their traced design, specification or delivery cause.

Operating performance view

Compliance, condition and maintenance performance compared across the portfolio.

Who it is for

The people who would use it.

Facilities and operations managers

Run the asset from a register that matches the building instead of rebuilding knowledge after handover.

Landlords and asset owners

See operating compliance and condition without commissioning a separate survey each cycle.

Compliance and HSE teams

Evidence statutory inspection and testing duties with the certificate behind each entry.

Commercial and contract teams

Pursue warranty and defect liability while the entitlement is still live.

Where the line sits

What it does not claim to do.

The boundaries matter as much as the capability.

  • Compliance status reflects the records supplied — the module does not certify that an inspection was performed correctly.
  • It does not replace statutory inspection bodies, authority approvals or a competent person's sign-off.
  • Maintenance recommendations are decision support; the operating regime remains the operator's responsibility.
  • AI findings are assistive and evidence-linked; acceptance and action remain human decisions.
  • In design — published so operators can shape it. It is not available today and no delivery date is committed.

Roadmap position · Next

What this module depends on.

Sequencing is driven by dependencies, not by marketing convenience. Nothing here is available today and no delivery date is committed.

Depends on

  • UnifyOS Handover
  • UnifyRetail OS
  • IntelliBridge

Already in place

  • Direction published and validated with operators
  • Asset, statutory-obligation and warranty model drafted against the handover evidence structure
  • Maintenance regime approach defined from specified and installed equipment

Still needed — In design

  • Handover module delivering verified asset and system records
  • CAFM, BMS and ERP integration patterns defined per client instance
  • Operating requirement and statutory inspection libraries per asset class and jurisdiction
  • Operator partner to shape maintenance and compliance cycles on a live asset

See where this sits against every other module on the UnifyOS roadmap.

Inside UnifyOS

How it connects to the rest of the platform.

Every module shares the same governance, evidence and audit standards, so intelligence carries forward instead of being rebuilt.

Handover

The completion record becomes the operating baseline with no re-entry of data.

Asset intelligence

Operating and condition data feeds lifecycle and capital planning.

IntelliBridge™

Connects to the CAFM, ERP or property-management platform already in use.

Client systems connect through IntelliBridge™, so this module would read from and write back to the platforms you already run.

Tell us what this needs to handle.

Requirements from live portfolios shape what gets built first — and what gets built at all.