Planned UnifyOS module · Handover & completion intelligence

Close projects on evidence, not on assurances.

Handover is where delivery risk concentrates: snag lists, statutory certificates, testing and commissioning records, warranties, O&M documentation and as-built information all land at once, usually against a fixed opening or occupation date.

The planned handover module tracks completion evidence as a structured set of requirements per unit, asset and system, so readiness is measured against what has actually been supplied and verified.

In design — informed by live retail and mixed-use handovers

These modules are roadmap positions within UnifyOS. They are in design or scoping, are not available today, and no delivery dates are committed. They are published so clients can see the direction of the platform and shape it — not to imply released functionality.

The problem

What goes wrong today.

  • Completion status reported by spreadsheet and confidence rather than evidence
  • Statutory certificates and test records chased at the last moment
  • Snags closed on a claim rather than on verified rectification
  • O&M and as-built information arriving incomplete after occupation
  • No reliable readiness picture across many units handing over at once

The intent

What the module is designed to do.

  • Define completion requirements per unit, asset and building system
  • Track certificates, test records, warranties and as-builts against those requirements
  • Score readiness for occupation, trading or beneficial use
  • Manage snag and defect close-out with evidence of rectification
  • Flag statutory and authority items that gate occupation
  • Hand a complete, structured asset record to operations

Data it would work from

Records that already exist on your projects.

  • Snag and defect registers
  • Testing and commissioning records
  • Statutory and authority certificates
  • Warranties, O&M manuals and as-built drawings
  • Inspection and site-observation records

Capabilities

What the module would do, in detail.

Worked through with delivery teams running live completions, so the design starts from how handover actually behaves.

Completion requirements, defined before the rush

Each unit, asset and building system carries a structured set of completion requirements — statutory, contractual and operational — agreed early rather than assembled in the final fortnight.

Evidence intake and matching

Certificates, test and commissioning records, warranties, O&M documents and as-builts are read on arrival and matched to the requirement they satisfy, with the source document retained as the evidence behind it.

Completeness and quality checks

Missing, expired, mismatched or unsigned records are flagged against the requirement, so a pack is not accepted simply because a folder is full.

Rectification verified, not claimed

Snags and defects close on evidence of rectification — inspection record, photograph, retest — rather than on a status change by the party responsible for the work.

Opening-readiness scoring

Readiness for occupation, trading or beneficial use is scored per unit and rolled up across the scheme, showing what is genuinely ready and what is being carried.

Statutory and authority gating

Items that legally gate occupation are separated from items that merely tidy the record, so attention goes where the opening date is actually at risk.

Structured handover pack assembly

The accepted evidence assembles itself into the handover record for each unit and system, ready to become the operating baseline instead of a box of documents.

What it produces

The records it would hand you.

Readiness position per unit and per scheme

One evidence-backed view of what is ready, what is outstanding and who owes it.

Statutory and certificate register

Every required certificate, its status, its expiry and the document behind it.

Rectification record

Open and closed snags with the evidence that closed them and the date it was verified.

Handover and O&M pack

The structured asset, system and warranty record handed to the operating team.

Exception report for the opening date

Only the items that gate occupation, ranked by the risk they carry to the date.

Who it is for

The people who would use it.

Delivery and project managers

See real completion status instead of a reported percentage, early enough to act on it.

Landlords and asset owners

Accept units on verified evidence, with a defensible record of what was accepted and when.

Commercial and contract teams

Hold completion positions, retention and warranty obligations against the responsible party.

Operating and facilities teams

Inherit a structured asset record rather than reconstructing one after occupation.

Where the line sits

What it does not claim to do.

The boundaries matter as much as the capability.

  • Readiness scores are assessments of supplied evidence, not certificates of completion or statutory approval.
  • The module does not issue, replace or substitute for any authority consent, occupation certificate or NOC.
  • AI findings are assistive and evidence-linked; acceptance, sign-off and handover remain human decisions.
  • In design — published so client delivery teams can shape it. No availability date is committed.

Roadmap position · Next

What this module depends on.

Sequencing is driven by dependencies, not by marketing convenience. Nothing here is available today and no delivery date is committed.

Depends on

  • UnifyRetail OS
  • UnifyProjectVision

Already in place

  • Completion evidence model drafted from live retail and mixed-use handovers
  • Readiness scoring approach defined against UnifyRetail OS records

Still needed — In design

  • Statutory certificate and testing-record templates per jurisdiction
  • Agreed definition of verified rectification with client delivery teams
  • O&M and as-built handover requirements structured per asset type
  • A live handover programme to validate against

See where this sits against every other module on the UnifyOS roadmap.

Inside UnifyOS

How it connects to the rest of the platform.

Every module shares the same governance, evidence and audit standards, so intelligence carries forward instead of being rebuilt.

UnifyRetail™ / UnifyRetail OS

Handover readiness feeds the opening-readiness view for each unit and the wider scheme.

UnifyProjectVision™

Completion evidence gaps surface as programme risk before they hit the occupation date.

Facilities management

The verified asset record becomes the operating baseline rather than a box of documents.

Client systems connect through IntelliBridge™, so this module would read from and write back to the platforms you already run.

Tell us what this needs to handle.

Requirements from live portfolios shape what gets built first — and what gets built at all.